Legal Summary

Alessio De Vecchi — Intellectual Property & Financial Dispute

ANYMA Project (Matteo Milleri)

Prepared: January 30, 2026 | Confidential — For Legal Review Only

Table of Contents

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Parties & Relationship
  3. Intellectual Property Ownership
  4. Financial Arrangement & Disputes
  5. Credit Erasure Pattern
  6. Key Incidents
  7. Evidence Summary
  8. Potential Legal Claims
  9. Requested Relief

1. Executive Summary

Alessio De Vecchi is the Visual Co-Creative Director of ANYMA, a groundbreaking audiovisual project in electronic music. He developed the project's entire visual identity with Matteo from the beginning in 2021, including the iconic robot characters EVA, LILITH, and ADAM that have become synonymous with the ANYMA brand.

Despite owning 50% of the character intellectual property and being responsible for all visual creative direction, Alessio faces:

  • Systematic credit erasure — Articles crediting him as "co-founder" are being removed (404)
  • Title theft — His "Creative Director" title was given to another person without his knowledge
  • Non-payment — Zero compensation from brand campaigns (Bulgari, Bose, Lancôme) despite 50% IP ownership
  • Financial opacity — No access to sales data, licensing agreements, or accounting
  • Arbitrary payments — $135K merchandise payment with no documentation

2. Parties & Relationship

Claimant

Alessio De Vecchi — Visual Co-Creative Director, ANYMA Project

Respondent

Matteo Milleri — Performing as "ANYMA"

Relationship

Alessio joined the ANYMA project in 2021 and developed the visual identity with Matteo from the beginning. Per Variety magazine: Alessio "became the first piece to the Anyma puzzle at the onset of the pandemic" and "has been involved since Anyma's inception."

3. Intellectual Property Ownership

Agreed IP Split

Party Character IP Ownership
Alessio De Vecchi 50%
Matteo Milleri 50%

Characters Created by Alessio

Prior Art

Alessio established his robot/cyborg aesthetic 13+ months BEFORE joining ANYMA:

Evidence of Ownership

4. Financial Arrangement & Disputes

Agreed Compensation Structure

Revenue Stream Alessio's Share Actual Payment
Salary Fixed amount Receiving
Live show revenue 0% (agreed) N/A
Third-party licensing Expected royalties (50% IP owner) $0
Merchandise Share based on IP ownership $135K (arbitrary, undocumented)

NFT Revenue Gap — ~$300K Owed

Item Amount
ANYMA NFT Revenue (estimated) ~$1,470,000
Alessio's 50% Share (should be) ~$735,000
Alessio Actually Received (blockchain) ~$436,000
GAP (Still Owed) ~$299,000

Brand Campaign Payments

Matteo has performed at brand campaigns where Alessio's visual assets were used:

Brand Alessio's Assets Used Payment to Alessio Notes
Bulgari Yes — custom visual created $20,000 Work-for-hire, not licensing share
Bose Yes (performance visuals) $0 No payment
Lancôme Yes (performance visuals) $0 No payment

Legal question: If Alessio owns 50% of character IP, shouldn't he receive 50% of licensing fees — not just a flat fee for custom work?

Merchandise Opacity

Alessio received $135,000 from merchandise in 2025/2026. However:

Blockchain-Verified Transactions (2021-2023)

Flow ETH USD (at transaction time)
ANYMA → Alessio 186.10 ETH $465,786
Alessio → ANYMA (investment) 11.49 ETH $29,726
Net 174.61 ETH $436,060

How the $436K Was Spent

The funds received were NOT personal profit. They were spent on ANYMA-related expenses:

Expense Amount Reimbursed?
Travel expenses (first 2 years) ~$150,000 NO
Ibiza housing (3 seasons) ~$100,000+ NO
Production costs Variable NO

De Facto Investment (Not Formalized)

A significant portion of the ~$463K Alessio withdrew went right back into ANYMA operations: travel for shows, Ibiza housing for work, production costs. This created a cycle:

Alessio funds productions → Productions generate live show revenue → Alessio receives 0% of live revenue

This was de facto investment, though never formalized in writing.

Contract Established (~2024)

After ~2 years without formal agreement, a contract was signed:

Term Details
IP Ownership 50% to Alessio on characters
Salary €18,000/month
Expenses Travel, etc. now covered
Live Show Revenue Still 0%

Critical Issue: Live Show Revenue

Even with the current contract, Alessio receives 0% of live performance revenue.

Yet his characters (EVA, LILITH, ADAM, SIREN) ARE the live show visuals. His visual work IS what audiences pay to see. Sphere shows had 200,000+ attendance at premium prices. Alessio's share: $0.

5. Credit Erasure Pattern

Systematic Removal of Attribution

Articles crediting Alessio as "co-founder" or "creator" are being removed from the internet:

Publication Original Attribution Status
NFT Metria "created 3D music project Anyma" 404 Removed
Real Music & Money "The Visionary Artist Behind Afterlife" 404 Removed
EDM Maniac "Anyma & Alessio De Vecchi NFT" 404 Removed
SuperRare Magazine (4 articles) Career interview, profiles 404 Removed

Credit Language Dilution

Period How Alessio Was Credited
2020-2021 "Co-founded", "Created ANYMA"
2022-2023 "Visual Co-Creative Director"
2024-2026 "Collaborator", technical roles emphasized

Solo Narrative in Press

6. Key Incidents

Incident 1: Sphere Announcement — No Credit (July 2024)

The Las Vegas Sphere residency was announced via Instagram with two posts featuring Alessio's robot character:

Date Post Alessio's Robot Likes Credit
July 14, 2024 Teaser Focal point 484K None
July 15, 2024 Announcement On Sphere display 1.1M None
Total 1.6M+ Zero

This incident triggered a major fallout between Alessio and Matteo.

Incident 2: Alexander Wessely — Title Theft (April 2024)

Without Alessio's knowledge, Matteo hired Alexander Wessely and promised him the "Creative Director" title — a title that belonged to Alessio.

Alessio had to escalate the situation right before the Sphere shows. Wessely was forced to publicly acknowledge Alessio's foundational role:

"A huge part of this world was shaped by Alessio De Vecchi, a brilliant visual artist, whose vision was foundational to the show." — Alexander Wessely, Flaunt Magazine
"Visual Director Alessio De Vecchi has been a core partner since the project's inception." — Alexander Wessely, Office Magazine

Alexander Wessely has since resigned.

Incident 3: Variety Interview — Credit Minimization

After the Wessely incident, a Variety interview was arranged. Alessio discussed creative vision, aesthetic philosophy, and character development. When published, the article only included technical details (screen resolution, etc.) — creative vision content was omitted.

Pattern: Reframe Alessio from "artist who built the visual world" to "technician who handles screen resolution."

Incident 4: Visual Identity Pivot

The oldest posts on @anyma Instagram show 100% of content featured Alessio's EVA robot character. Recently, there has been an unsuccessful pivot toward Matteo's personal image, attempting to reduce dependency on Alessio's creations.

7. Evidence Summary

Documentation Secured

Category Quantity Location
Project files (C4D, AEP, SSP) 951+ Personal Google Drive
Miro board exports 13 boards PDF + JSON with timestamps
Web sources (active) 21+ Archived via Wayback Machine
Removed articles (404) 10+ Some recovered via Wayback
Blockchain transactions 11 transfers Etherscan (verifiable)
Screenshots Multiple Instagram, TikTok evidence

Third-Party Validation

Fan Recognition

8. Potential Legal Claims

Intellectual Property

  1. Breach of IP agreement — Using Alessio's 50% IP without proper compensation
  2. Misappropriation — Commercial use of character IP in brand campaigns without royalty payment
  3. Moral rights violation — Systematic removal of attribution and credit

Financial

  1. Breach of fiduciary duty — Failure to provide financial transparency to 50% IP owner
  2. Underpayment/Non-payment of royalties — $0 from brand campaigns (Bulgari, Bose, Lancôme)
  3. Accounting demand — Right to audit merchandise sales and licensing deals

Reputational

  1. Defamation/false light — Misrepresenting Alessio as "technical contributor" rather than creative partner
  2. Tortious interference — Giving Alessio's title to another person

9. Requested Relief

Immediate

  1. Full accounting of all merchandise sales (units, revenue, margins)
  2. Documentation of all brand campaign licensing deals
  3. Explanation of how $135K merchandise payment was calculated
  4. Written confirmation of 50% IP ownership

Compensation

  1. 50% of licensing fees from Bulgari, Bose, Lancôme campaigns
  2. Adjustment of merchandise payments if underpaid based on audit
  3. Future royalty structure for all third-party IP uses

Credit/Attribution

  1. Restoration of proper credit as Visual Co-Creative Director
  2. Acknowledgment as co-creator in official communications
  3. Cease and desist on credit minimization efforts